heh, thanks for posting this. i guess this begs the next question:
is r6rs the 'most pragmatic and internally beautiful' thing? and have its innovations (or lack thereof) been the product of a feedback loop revising flaws in the existing standard, or is it something else entirely? -elf On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Robby Findler wrote: > One answer to this was posted on the plt-scheme blog: > > http://blog.plt-scheme.org/2007/06/r6rs-is-perfect.html > > Robby > > On 10/30/07, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> this is a query directed at those in support of r6rs: >> >> does r6rs represent a manifestation of the Right Thing? >> >> >> reason for this query: it seems as though the major difference between the >> various factions boils down to the Rightness or lack thereof of r6rs. do >> those defending r6rs claim that it is the Right Thing? this is unclear. >> >> >> -elf >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> r6rs-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
