On 30 Oct 2007, at 15:28, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > It is amusing to read these debates though I don't think > it is productive in any way. Why don't we all spend time > on producing R6RS or ERRR5RS compliant Scheme implementations > and then use the feedback from these efforts to move forward?
My impression is that some people think that R6RS already got a number of fundamental design decisions wrong, even though they could have be gotten right already. I guess it's not motivating to fix conceptual bugs that, in their view, shouldn't be there in the first place. Pascal -- Pascal Costanza, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://p-cos.net Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
