On Nov 12, 2007, at 2:25 PM, Felix Klock wrote: > I personally do not care how we resolve the issue of case > sensitivity in these cases, but I think it is important that we > resolve how to go about interpreting the R6RS in general. > > Either there is a bug in the formal grammar, or we are going to > agree to this method of interpretation where we informally modify > the formal grammar.
Sorry, I forgot to cover a third case. I should have said "either +nan.0 and +inf.0 and their ilk are case- sensitive, or there is a bug in the formal grammar, or we are going to agree to this method of interpretation where we informally modify the formal grammar." -Felix _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
