Bradley Lucier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tried to search the archives using google, but it isn't so easy > when searching for non-letter characters. > > At any rate, it appears there's a fixnum->flonum, but no flonum- > >fixnum; is this intentional? Is there a rationale available?
This was present in the original draft of SRFI 77, but removed during the discussion period. You'll find a statement to that effect in the "Revision History" section on http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-77/srfi-77.html Will Clinger made the actual change, but I assume it was made in response to the general call to pare down the set of operations on flonums, many of which had only marginal value. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
