On Apr 24, 2008, at 3:26 PM, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote: >> As far as I can tell, with R6RS we have to keep up tradition (in >> several Schemes) of explicitly exporting every >> accessor/mutator/predicate/constructor for a (syntactic) record type >> definition. If this issue was discussed, I'd be interested to read >> that discussion. > > That's correct.
Well, you don't "have to" export everything, but you can if you wanted to. You usually export a (typically small) subset of the things you define. [I think this is what you meant but just want to make sure] Aziz,,, _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
