Ryan Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To clarify -- the question is why is there with-output-to-file rather > than with-output-to-port?
For compatibility with R5RS mainly. The `current-output-port' procedure is also there for that reason---in addition, it needs to be there so that there's a single natively encoded port for standard output. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
