In case this wasn't clear: On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 07:59 -0700, Derick Eddington wrote: > Using `with-exception-handler' with a > handler which re-raises, one can make it re-raise > using `raise-continuable' incase the preceding handler wants to return,
By "preceding" handler I meant in terms of installation order of handlers. Or in other words, the "next" handler, the one that is the handler for the handler. > and if the original raise was done with `raise-continuable' this works > like the raiser and the handlers all wanted, and if the original raise > was done with `raise', the &non-continuable exception is raised when > the first handler returns By "first" handler I meant the most recently installed handler, the one called by the original raise. -- : Derick ---------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
