On Jan 15, Per Bothner wrote:
> Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > On Jan 15, Per Bothner wrote:
> >> Is this (rough sketch) supposed to work:
> >>
> >> (define (process form)
> >> ... do something with form ...)
> >>
> >> (define-syntax foo
> >> (lambda (form)
> >> (syntax-case form ()
> >> ((_ . f) (process form)))))
> >>
> >> (foo ...)
> >>
> >> I.e. can a syntax-case macros make use of a function
> >> define in the same module or top-level?
> >
> > Yes, but syntax processing still happens at a different phase, so you
> > need to lift the `process' definition.
>
> Chapter 10 does not contain the word "phase". Where is this
> concept described in the R6RS documents?
I posted my reply by mistake, thinking that it was on the PLT list.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://www.barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
