Ray Dillinger scripsit: > There's a compelling case for a scheme-oid lisp with a > "strings as immutable values" interpretation where > characters are just strings that happen to be short.
+1 > It would be cleaner semantics than R6, but such > a large semantic change and breaks so much existing > code that I can't imagine that it's likely to be a > reasonable direction to go. Also +1, alas. I'd like to see a lot more immutability in Scheme. You can readily construct mutability from immutability with a box, but not vice versa. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] Please leave your values Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel --Cordelia Vorkosigan _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
