David Rush scripsit:

> First: I think that those who wanted to keep the R6RS process
> discussions private have been hugely vindicated by the way the
> Steering Committee discussion went totally off the rails and became a
> technical discussion of what the language should become. 

I profoundly disagree.  The discussion exposed how dedicated people are
to Scheme, either Scheme-as-it-is or Scheme-as-it-could/should-be.
That issue is political, and entirely appropriate for this list,
which is a general discussion list, not one dedicated to process.

-- 
John Cowan  [email protected]  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Does anybody want any flotsam? / I've gotsam.
Does anybody want any jetsam? / I can getsam.
        --Ogden Nash, No Doctors Today, Thank You

_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss

Reply via email to