On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:19 -0500, Sam TH wrote: > Umm, quoting Alan's message: > > > According to -these- ballots the new Steering Committee would be: Feeley, > > Rees and Clinger.
I misread. Thanks for pointing that out. > > And I reimplemented the algorithm from scratch, and confirm his > results. Shivers was 4th, and Hanson 5th. > Good man. (You should share your code to complete the gesture.) > Curiously, if the SC was expanded to 4, the results, in order, would be > Feeley, Shivers, Rees, Clinger Yes, well, as far as I'm concerned we could have as well drawn names from a hat but, that's just me. I do not mean by that any disrespect at all towards the winners, only to the contest. -t > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Thomas Lord <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's sort of funny that all of the > > information that goes into the results > > of the election has been available for > > a while now yet nobody has bothered > > to both run the program to find the outcome > > and posted about it, even if unofficially. > > > > > > "Dear lazyweb.." - jwz > > -t > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > r6rs-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
