Vincent Manis scripsit: > This raises an interesting point. Perhaps there are language standards > that have no implementation-defined behavior. I have certainly never > seen one.
ES 3.1 is attempting to reach the stage where there is no *explicitly* undefined behavior. The same is true of Java. There may, of course, be undefined behavior as a result of overlooked points. For example, it is not explicitly prescribed by ES 3.1 that evaluating arithmetic expressions cannot have side effects. -- Values of beeta will give rise to dom! John Cowan (5th/6th edition 'mv' said this if you tried http://www.ccil.org/~cowan to rename '.' or '..' entries; see [email protected] http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/odd.html) _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
