Aubrey Jaffer wrote: > Your classification adds no objective information to the table. > Please remove your arbitrary tiers.
David Rush wrote: > It surely looks like you're metric is simply: "Joe Marshall's > favorites". And it also looks like an opening shot in the pissing > match over the features of LargeScheme. Is there anything actually > *measured* by this "metric"? It isn't a ranking by my favorites, but it does seem that I've put my foot in it. I've removed the tiers, arbitrary metric A, and sorted the implementations alphabetically. -- ~jrm _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
