On 2009-09-06, at 17:45, John Cowan wrote: > Vincent Manis scripsit: >> I really encourage the Committee to do *NO* programming language >> research as part of this project. [...] R7RS should comprise only >> features that... >> >> b) have already been implemented in at least one Scheme system... > +1, with one amendment: "at least two Scheme systems". At least, that > is what I have proposed to the SC, based on the experience of the > IETF, > the W3C, and various other standards organizations. This makes a LOT of sense. +1 from me.
-- v _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
