Alaric Snell-Pym scripsit: > Yeah. I'd be all for textually including the interesting SRFIs into > R7RS, for this reason, and to protect the standard against SRFIs being > updated in future
Well, "textually" is too verbose: they contain justifications, implementations, and such cruft. But that's the spirit of http://tinyurl.com/thing-one . > (AIUI there's no process for that at the moment, > but there might be one in future?) The update process, as for RFCs, is to issue a new one and mark the old one deprecated. So far, the editors have not done the latter. -- Man has no body distinct from his soul, John Cowan for that called body is a portion of the soul [email protected] discerned by the five senses, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan the chief inlets of the soul in this age. --William Blake _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
