On Sep 9, 2009, at 3:09 PM, John Cowan wrote: > True. But I see nothing about tokens which don't require implicit > termination because they have explicit terminators.
The grammar for <token> admits four productions (named in the quote I gave) which require implicit termination; all others are explicitly terminated. Tokens which have explicit terminators may be followed immediately by another token, because nothing else would forbid it. Or is there something else I'm missing? -- Brian Mastenbrook [email protected] http://brian.mastenbrook.net/ _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
