2009/9/11 Vincent Manis <[email protected]>: > <scheme-name> ::= <implementation>? <standard>? <level>? "Scheme". > <standard-name> ::= "R" <integer> "RS". > <implementation> ::= <identifier>+. > <level> ::= <identifier>.
Funny ^^ > This gives us Yucca Flats Scheme and Garbanzo Bean Scheme, along with > R7RS Toaster Scheme and R7RS Scheme, which matches the profile Brian > says he wants to be unqualified. > This is all overkill, right? :) But I'm afraid it is both wrong and underkill… Wrongness: <standard> and <standard-name> do not match Underkillness: <implementation> contains no space, while "Yucca Flats" and "Garbanzo Bean" do. Incompleteness: what if the implementation's name *contains* "R<integer>RS"? But I really start to get use to "Toaster Scheme" to the point I consider calling my (yet-to-do) implementation like this ^^ P! -- Français, English, 日本語, 한국어 _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
