Andrew Pochinsky scripsit: > Indisputably so for a language that is designed by piling feature upon > feature. If Scheme still strives to the goal set at the beginning of > the RnRS introduction, this is one feeble excuse for deficiencies of > the standard, if you ask me. One easy way out is to be consistent and > remove the first paragraph completely; however, I doubt that many > would agree to this.
If you think you can do better, you are heartily invited to try. See the .sig below (hand-chosen this time, though usually not). -- Your worships will perhaps be thinking John Cowan that it is an easy thing to blow up a dog? http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [Or] to write a book? --Don Quixote, Introduction [email protected] _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
