> Trust that for some people the REPL *is* the most central mode of
> use for the language
+1, of course.
(Also of course, what's most important isn't that R7RS say "there must be
a REPL," but rather that it refrain from specifying semantic constraints
("two-pass", e.g.) that are difficult or impossible to provide in a REPL.
And let's not go back to the bad old days when compiled Lisp had different
semantics (lexical scope) from interpreted Lisp (dynamic scope).)
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
