On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:50 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Brian Mastenbrook wrote: > >> `begin' is a binding form. > > No, BEGIN is not a binding form.
Fine. So, which of the properties that I enumerated are you going to dispense with? The first, I presume. And what are you going to do with the R6RS two-pass semantics? Ignore them, I suppose. I don't think this is a workable solution. This is just the R(IEEE, 4,5)RS partisans exacting their revenge on the R6RS users. -- Brian Mastenbrook [email protected] http://brian.mastenbrook.net/ _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
