> I don't know about you but I *do* regard strings primarily as > text intended for human readability
+1 Does anyone think that bytevectors are a necessary feature of WG1 Scheme? I can see why WG2 should have both strings and bytevectors, but WG1 shouldn't (imho) include anything about bytes, binary, etc. Maybe not even bitwise logical operators. (Of course all that stuff will be loadable as optional libraries, like the rest of WG2's features.) _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
