On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:23 AM, John Cowan wrote: > 2) Fixnums + flonums (limited range and precision types only) > > 5) Fixnums + flonums + compnums (2 with inexact complex numbers)
Can someone please explain to me why bignums are so onerous a requirement that implementations can't be expected to implement them? I'm not understanding why conses, vectors, strings, etc. can all be required, but bignums are problematic. -- Brian Mastenbrook [email protected] http://brian.mastenbrook.net/ _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
