On Mon 28 Sep 2009 09:14, John Cowan <[email protected]> writes: > If it makes no sense for a Scheme system to offer a C FFI, it > shouldn't offer one; but that said, most systems are embedded in a C > rather than a JVM or CLR world, and standardizing a C FFI, at least on > the Scheme side, makes a great deal of sense to me.
A C standard FFI interface, on the Scheme level, would make a good SRFI. It's not relevant to the standardization process of Scheme itself, though. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
