On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 15:51 +0100, David Rush wrote:
> I am starting to suspect that the only truly correct way to move
> forward on macro modularity is to rebase the notion of a Scheme system
> as a purely interpreted textual language. Just throw the notion of
> static analysis out the door. Compilation then becomes a very
> aggressive partial evaluation of the program text.
> Others in the discussion have hinted at this...
+1. This interpretation would be a very happy thing for WG1 scheme.
Bear
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
