On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 09:17 +0100, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
> I think there's no reason why nice, simple, elegant REPL semantics are
> a problem for compilers (and they don't even need to be Sufficiently
> Smart Compilers). Yes, you need to move away from traditional notions
> of compilation, but valuable metapgramming features force that on us
> anyway: for the simple reason that compilation involves a lot of
> execution of arbitrary code rather than just a static analysis.
You are right.
Thank you.
Bear
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
