I like this idea, too. I think the existing syntax/parse documentation is a good example of how this can work well. It has an excellent introduction, numerous examples, and then it gets into explicit reference material. It seems natural to have this grouped together, in that order, and it's very helpful.
http://docs.racket-lang.org/syntax/stxparse.html p.s. Yes, I'm acting like one of the animals in that parable where the chicken wants to make bread. None of the other animals volunteers to plant the seed, harvest the wheat, and so on. But they're all willing to help eat the bread! But I like the idea! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAGspUn2xWWYisrNBwbjgVUMQ0%2BLazWQ-G5kB51prjjnKSYGKOQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
