> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:15 AM, Robby Findler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Yes: I would say that we cannot change < in #lang racket, but a new > design of a number system that does something different isn't out of > the possibility. There is a lot of tricky design issues, tho.
Sorry, I’m not proposing any change at all to … ah, I see, sorting is parameterized over the predicate, so this is necessarily a discussion about <, not a discussion about sort. Sorry for the noise, John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/d7a85ef0-09be-4595-a532-e6e0b38155b5%40mtasv.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
