On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:12:09 -0500, Stephen Chang wrote: > > > - Iteration over hash tables using `in-hash`, `in-hash-pairs`, > > `in-mutable-hash` and `in-mutable-set` have improved performance, up > > to twice as fast on microbenchmarks. > > This is not equivalent to my original text. How about: > > Hash table and set iteration, via both existing and new non-generic > sequences, is more performant, up to twice as fast on microbenchmarks.
Sorry. I tried to simplify them. Let's use your new text. Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/m2d1plza00.wl-stamourv%40eecs.northwestern.edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
