On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: >> A third view is that the `compiled` subdir should be open to all who want >> to use it, but that there should be a convention of each package making a >> subdirectory therein, so that the `racket` caches don't mess with `pollen` >> caches and vice versa and so on (which would be more of a social convention >> than technical convention) > > This sounds like a good direction. Maybe a convention could be based on > file extensions and/or subdirectories, since tools like `raco make` and > `raco setup` will write only ".zo" and ".dep" files.
Using ring-0 pkg names as the names of those directories sounds right to me. (DrRacket already uses this convention (but I think its use predates pkgs).) Robby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAL3TdOOg1QqbKw31Mksc8C13V8PwSd_oHjVHZj%3D2ELAzHmEvuw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
