On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0600, Gustavo Massaccesi wrote: > - 58333903 > I like it, specially because it's the result of many intermediate > steps, like 7c1cb1a2. But it's difficult to explain (specially because > it depends on the knowledge that equal? is much slower than eq?). So I > think it's better to ignore it in the announcement.
I think it's safe to assume (or very briefly state) that `equal?` can be much more expensive than `eq?`. But we can leave it out if you prefer. Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to racket-dev@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/m2h94w1brb.wl-stamourv%40eecs.northwestern.edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
