On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0600, Gustavo Massaccesi wrote: > - 58333903 > I like it, specially because it's the result of many intermediate > steps, like 7c1cb1a2. But it's difficult to explain (specially because > it depends on the knowledge that equal? is much slower than eq?). So I > think it's better to ignore it in the announcement.
I think it's safe to assume (or very briefly state) that `equal?` can be much more expensive than `eq?`. But we can leave it out if you prefer. Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/m2h94w1brb.wl-stamourv%40eecs.northwestern.edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
