How does this impact things that cannot work without special modification to the runtime system like places and futures?
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:47 AM Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > At Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:40:20 -0500, "'John Clements' via Racket > Developers" wrote: > > > A Racket on Chez won't be compatible with the current Racket VM at the > > > level of the C API. [...] > > > > You mention incompatibility at the level of the C API. I read that > > three or four times before deciding that this isn’t about those > > writing Racket packages that use FFI to interact with C libraries, > > but rather those rare packages that want to use Racket’s C API to > > interact with Racket. Is this correct? > > That's right. I expect Racket's FFI to mostly work as a layer on Chez's > FFI, so most Racket programs that use `ffi/unsafe` can continue to work. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/20170215164752.39C97650090%40mail-svr1.cs.utah.edu > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAEkQqGS-TsdUgq23K54RO4-cOs8abVh5R-Ahvfga-D2E8W1yrA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
