Do the "missing documentation" todos take into account packages that have their docs provided by other packages? e.g. a "foo-lib" package documented in a "foo-doc" package. If not, perhaps there could be some special info.rkt field to mark other packages that provide documentation for a package without its docs directly included.
On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 9:09:32 AM UTC-7, jay.mccarthy wrote: > > If you go to the package site now, then every package table will tell > you how many of the packages shown have some sort of flaw. The flaws > are: failing to build, tests failing, missing documentation, missing > tags, or missing a description. (We need to fix it a little bit > because some packages aren't supposed to have docs, like > web-server-lib, because its docs are in web-server-doc.) > > Conor Finegan implemented this. Good job! > > -- > -=[ Jay McCarthy http://jeapostrophe.github.io ]=- > -=[ Associate Professor PLT @ CS @ UMass Lowell ]=- > -=[ Moses 1:33: And worlds without number have I created; ]=- > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/6ffce231-69f6-4e68-9ed7-d64a3b989673%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
