At Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:18:05 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > Would it make sense to fork Chez?
While we have already forked Chez Scheme in the sense that GitHub reports at the top of https://github.com/racket/ChezScheme/, I think our fork is more usefully described as a set of patches to Chez Scheme. I've tried to keep the Racket-specific changes organized that way (with each patch recorded in a branch), and we sync with the main Chez Scheme repo regularly. This approach should continue working for the foreseeable future. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/20190423152122.7E5476500D3%40mail-svr1.cs.utah.edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
