> On Dec 3, 2019, at 2:01 PM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Section 7.5, about the Haskell implementation, points out that the C > operator is more useful here than `call/cc`. That avoids the need to > set up an `abort` continuation, and it could replace an explicit > truncation operation. Then again, `call/cc` is still handy for various > purposes in Racket CS's Rumble layer to reflect on the continuation > without aborting.
Yes, I meant C not F. (Copying/appending the stacks is too expensive in most cases.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/C9AA4512-E856-42F6-82F0-2BBB551882BC%40felleisen.org.
