Wouldn't it make sense to add a footnote to the release notes with a URL or 
more detailed information? I know, this sounds nuts. In my mind, though, the 
main body of the release notes should be short enough to skim to see whether 
there’s anything interesting, but I don’t see a better place to put the deeper 
information.

John

> On Feb 1, 2020, at 10:12, Robby Findler <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Looks like two bullets to me. Here's an edit:
> 
> 
>  * The Web Server provides fine-grained control over various aspects of
>    handling client connections (timeouts, buffer sizes, maximum header
>    counts, etc.) via the new "safety limits" construct.
> 
>  * The web server's default level of trust in client connections is
>    lower.  Resource-intensive applications may need to adjust the
>    defaults (e.g., to accept large file uploads).
> 
> I don't think anything I eliminated is essential for the release notes
> (keeping in mind that many will learn about this when their website
> doesn't work anymore -- they won't read the release notes at that
> point I expect ....)
> 
> Robby
> 
> 
> Robby
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 11:35 AM 'John Clements' via Racket Developers
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> This bullet is a teensy bit bulky, but I stared at it for a few minutes and… 
>> I’d rather switch than fight. I guess that’s why I’m not a Tareyton smoker.
>> 
>> John
>> 
>>> On Jan 27, 2020, at 11:23, Philip McGrath <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:28 AM Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I would also highlight that the web
>>> server change is technically not backward-compatible.
>>> …
>>>  * The Web Server provides fine-grained control over various aspects of
>>>   handling client connections (timeouts, buffer sizes, maximum header
>>>   counts, etc.) via the new "safety limits" construct.
>>> 
>>>   Using this new construct, we have decreased the web server's default
>>>   level of trust in client connections and made it detect additional,
>>>   maliciously constructed requests. To get the old behavior for use in
>>>   trusted settings, start the web server with `#:safety-limits
>>>   (make-unlimited-safety-limits)`.
>>> 
>>> It isn't only fully trusted settings that need to pay attention: for 
>>> example, if you expect non-malicious file uploads larger than 10 MiB, you 
>>> will need to make an adjustment.
>>> 
>>> Also, `(make-unlimited-safety-limits)` isn't quite the old behavior: I 
>>> wouldn't get into this level of detail in the announcement, but the default 
>>> behavior was closest to `(make-unlimited-safety-limits 
>>> #:request-read-timeout 60)`, or, if you'd provided optional arguments 
>>> `max-waiting` and `initial-connection-timeout` (which weren't accepted at 
>>> all entry points), `(make-unlimited-safety-limits #:request-read-timeout 
>>> initial-connection-timeout #:max-waiting max-waiting)`. (This is in the 
>>> docs in even more detail.)
>>> 
>>> For those who haven't followed this discussion, there was a conflict here 
>>> between wanting to provide safe defaults and strict backwards 
>>> compatibility. The new construct gives programmers the ability to specify 
>>> how they want to balance these concerns in the future, with 
>>> `make-unlimited-safety-limits` meaning "don't impose any limits I haven't 
>>> explicitly listed." This time, though, we had to make a choice, and safety 
>>> seemed like the right choice for most cases, especially if you interpret 
>>> the old behavior as "we'll try to do the right thing generally, and here 
>>> are just a couple of tuning knobs."
>>> 
>>> Here's an attempt at putting that into a bullet:
>>> 
>>> * The Web Server provides fine-grained control over various aspects of
>>>   handling client connections (timeouts, buffer sizes, maximum header
>>>   counts, etc.) via the new "safety limits" construct.
>>> 
>>>   Using this new construct, we have decreased the web server's default
>>>   level of trust in client connections and made it detect additional,
>>>   maliciously constructed requests. Resource-intensive applications may
>>>   need to adjust the default limits (for example, to accept large file 
>>> uploads).
>>>   In trusted settings, they can be disabled completely by starting the web 
>>> server
>>>   with `#:safety-limits (make-unlimited-safety-limits)`.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Racket Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAH3z3gbLfyjE5F-BdNj5MbjBkihJgL65kKjZbZf3%3Dtd_cV8%3D1g%40mail.gmail.com.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Racket Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/d6371e41-40f1-4340-b5e4-302706ae34a5%40mtasv.net.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/d19d804a-f98f-4b65-acf0-3f0c9d346f80%40mtasv.net.

Reply via email to