At Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:45:55 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Also, are stencil-vector implementations of HAMTs a new invention, or > is the some previous work on this we should mention?
"Stencil vector" is not a phrase anyone knows --- at least, I hope it doesn't mean something I didn't intend --- since I picked it for a new API in Chez Scheme. So, I'd drop "Stencil-Vector" from the bullet. For this one, > * The `call-in-continuation` form (due to Marc Feeley) allows the > elimination of unnecessary thunk creation. how about this?: * The `call-in-continuation` function (like Marc Feeley's `continuation-graft`) simplifies certain `call/cc` patterns by calling a thunk in a restored continuation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/5ea9f7e0.1c69fb81.8ddd1.0118SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.
