On Aug 2, Tim Brown wrote:
> [...]
> Is there any way ask scribble to re-present the list of strings as an
> @-form?
>
> If not I could do with help in implementing such.
There's no way to do that now. The at-exp reader leaves syntax
properties on what it reads which can be used to reconstruct the
@-forms for rendering, but it's not doing that at the moment. This is
also a problem for racket code (in plain scribble documentation) which
is using the usual reader to read the expressions -- and I think that
the best way to deal with that is to eventually leave the code as
strings (that is, use @racket{...code...} instead of
@racket[...code...]).
But that still won't apply in your case, and I'm not sure that there's
something that would. (For example, what if you use comments in the
@list{...} blocks?)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
