On Aug 3, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Todd O'Bryan wrote: > A couple of stylistic questions that I just have to get off my chest: > > 1. Is there a reason that mutators don't start with the struct name > like all the other functions introduced by "define-struct"?
No. (Other than history) > 2. Just as a personal peeve, You are entitled to as many peeves as you'd like. The neat thing is that Racket's identifier syntax is liberal and allows you to use dots. I have been doing so for years :-) and I didn't complain to the mailing list. > .. is it worth considering such a change for HtDP/2e? I try to stick to Racket tradition in HtDP/2e when I can. Even though HtDP/2e is NOT about Racket -- even if some mailings on certain other mailing lists seem to imply that our goals are to Racketeer the world -- I would like to lay the foundation for the Racket books I want to write some day: HtDC (as in Components) and HtDS (as in Systems). _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
