This looks like one of those odd #%module-begin bugs that comes up when you have a module with exactly one form inside it. I believe that these days,
#lang s-exp module-path form ... is actually equivalent to (module name module-path (#%module-begin form ...)) The distinction is only meaningful when "form ..." is a sequence with exactly one element. Either add the #%module-begin or add one more form to the file and it should behave the same. (I have not tried this, however, and could be wrong.) Carl Eastlund On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <[email protected]> wrote: > According to the docs, > > #lang s-exp module-path > form ... > > is equivalent to > > (module name module-path > form ...) > > Yet: > > #lang s-exp lang/htdp-advanced > > (check-expect 1 2) > > runs without error (though there is no error signaled either), whereas > > Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.0 [3m]. > Language: racket; memory limit: 128 MB. > > (module M lang/htdp-advanced (check-expect 1 2)) > . check-expect: found a test that is not at the top level in: > (check-expect 1 2) > > What am I missing? > > Shriram _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
