I came up with this little hack that lets you avoid giving an explicit argument list to functions. Arguments are discovered by usages of underscores followed by a number, like _1 and _2. Partly inspired by scala; sure to make your blood boil if you love hygiene.

;;; usage
(define/implicit foo1 (printf "~a ~a ~a\n" _8 _9 _8))
(foo1 5 12)

;;; code
#lang racket/base

(require (for-syntax racket/base
                     racket/list
                     syntax/parse
                     )
         racket/stxparam)

(define-syntax-rule (implicits all thing ...)
  (begin
    (define-syntax-parameter thing (lambda (stx)
(raise-syntax-error #f (format "~a can only be used in a
 define/implicit function" 'thing))))
    ...
    (provide thing ...)
    (define-for-syntax all (list #'thing ...))))

(implicits all-implicits _1 _2 _3 _4 _5 _6 _7 _8 _9 _10)

(provide define/implicit lambda/implicit)
(define-syntax (lambda/implicit stx)
  (define (find-implicits stx)
    (define-syntax-class implicit
                         [pattern x:identifier
                                  #:when (ormap (lambda (y)
(free-identifier=? y #'x))
                                                all-implicits)])
    (remove-duplicates
      (filter values
              (syntax-parse stx
                [x:implicit (list #'x)]
[(x ...) (apply append (map find-implicits (syntax->list #'(x ...))))]
                [else (list #f)]))
      free-identifier=?))
  (syntax-parse stx
    [(_ body ...)
     (define implicit-arguments (find-implicits stx))
(with-syntax ([(new-arg ...) (generate-temporaries implicit-arguments)]
                   [(implicit ...) implicit-arguments])
       #'(lambda (new-arg ...)
(syntax-parameterize ([implicit (make-rename-transformer #'new-arg)] ...)
                                body ...)))]))

(define-syntax-rule (define/implicit name body ...)
                    (define name (lambda/implicit body ...)))

_________________________________________________
 For list-related administrative tasks:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Reply via email to