I am using the class system, and contracting objects. The documentation says that objects (without implementing equal<%>) are only equal? if they are eq?. My assumption was that when using equal?, the contract-wrapper objects would look through to the base value and compare them using equal? which would in turn use eq? (in the default case). This does not seem to be the case, it appears that they are still using eq? on the contracted values which leads to confusing results. Is this the intended behavior?
-Eric #lang racket (provide (all-defined-out)) (define a (new object%)) (define/contract b (object/c) a) (equal? a a) ;=> #t (equal? a b) ;=> #f (equal? b a) ;=> #f (equal? b b) ;=> #f (define c b) (equal? c a) ;=> #f (equal? c b) ;=> #f (equal? c c) ;=> #t _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
