On 09/21/2010 03:36 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:31 PM, John Clements
<[email protected]> wrote:
It looks to me like match doesn't work nicely with #:super structs. For
instance, this program:
[snip]
It's easy to work around this, but it would be nice if it worked. Am I missing
something obvious?
I don't know if it's obvious, but `match' is relying on static
information about the fields of `b', but `struct:a' is only known
dynamically. So at expansion time, `match' has no idea how many other
fields there might be other than the ones explicitly declared in `b'.
I thought match raised an error if the static info wasn't completely known.
Ryan
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
