I can picture John Cleese, wearing a legal wig, delivering your advise
in episode n.
RAC
On Oct 14, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Robby Findler
<[email protected]> wrote:
Ah. Then the answers are "scripting" and "compiled". Unless they want
to hear "programming" and "compiled". Basically any of the four
possible answers are all correct (insomuch as the questions actually
make sense).
Robby
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Richard Cleis <[email protected]> wrote:
Ok. But... Carrions de Dwimmerlaik provide funding; they want
answers to
these questions.
RAC
On Oct 14, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Robby Findler <[email protected]
>
wrote:
'Begone foul dwimmerlaik, lord of carrion! Leave the dead in peace!'
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:56 PM, namekuseijin <[email protected]
>
wrote:
he would probably look at you funny and point you to Amazon.com and
some deep obscure Lord of the Rings passage.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Richard Cleis <[email protected]>
wrote:
How would he respond to questions that I must answer: "You use
Racket?
For scripting or for programming? Is Racket interpreted or
compiled?"
rac
On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:51 PM, namekuseijin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Richard Cleis <[email protected]>
wrote:
As someone who doesn't know better, I like your post. Can you
explain
'script' ?
as Larry Wall put it:
"Suppose you went back to Ada Lovelace and asked her the
difference
between a script and a program. She'd probably look at you
funny, then
say something like: Well, a script is what you give the actors,
but a
program is what you give the audience. That Ada was one sharp
lady..."
source:
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Larry_Wall#The_State_of_the_Onion_11
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
