In fact, I proposed adding the ? forms of these functions where the new ones are strictly boolean.
These are essential for the SLs since the standard versions are useless due to the true/false tests in the language. On Nov 11, 2010 6:44 AM, "Jay McCarthy" <[email protected]> wrote: I agree with Mark. I often write ? versions of functions like member in my code when I write it the first time to show the "predicate intent". Another important case is when you don't want internal values to "escape" to the client because you forget that member/and/etc return the thing, not #t. Jay On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2... -- Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://...
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
