> ; net-pay: number -> number > ; given gross pay, produces net pay > (define (net-pay gross-pay) > (- gross-pay (tax gross-pay))) > > Ah okay, I was using hours as the only user input to have a whole function > calculate netpay of one input.
Yes, you should still do that. The above is just a helper function (like "pay"); it's not the function you tell the users about. Perhaps a better name for it would be "deduct-tax", leaving the original name "net-pay" free to be used for the function that takes in hours and returns net pay. Stephen Bloch [email protected] _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
