I understand. However, not only that disregards type promotion but also
is incoherent since (+ 0 0.0) evaluates to 0.0.
On 13-02-2011 16:17, Robby Findler wrote:
I believe one of the rules is that multiplying exact 0 by any number
gives you back exact 0.
Robby
2011/2/13 José Lopes<[email protected]>:
Shouldn't (* 0.0 0) evaluate to 0.0?
--
José António Branquinho de Oliveira Lopes
58612 - MEIC-A
[email protected]
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
--
José António Branquinho de Oliveira Lopes
58612 - MEIC-A
[email protected]
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
