On Feb 13, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> In any case, wouldn't >> >> (test E /=> #f) >> >> be even shorter and clearer? > > I find `/=>' extremely confusing. If it means a simple "does not > evaluate to", then what happens when E throws an error?
There are two things "/=>" could mean: "does not evaluate to", or "evaluates to something other than". I'd lean towards the latter, for the reason you point out. But whichever, as long as it's documented. Stephen Bloch [email protected] _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
