I want to second this. It is interesting that an argument for untyped languages often goes along the lines of what is Danny saying here is a benefit of a typed language.
N. On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Danny Yoo <[email protected]> wrote: > I do want to say that, despite some troubles I've been having with > Typed Racket, it's still awesome. I'm building another prototype > Racket->JS compiler, and because it's still very experimental, I find > myself having to change the data types a lot. I'm using Typed Racket > to code it, and it's been well worth the effort. The type discipline > has been extraordinarily helpful in catching me as I'm iterating the > design of the data structures. So thank you to everyone who's been > contributing to Typed Racket! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
