We don't yet have a 64-bit build for Windows on the download pages, but Racket builds, runs, and is supported for 64-bit mode in Windows (Vista and up).
At Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:56:56 -0500, Greg Hendershott wrote: > On Windows 7 I would if I could. A 64-bit build of Racket for Windows > could utilize more than 2 GB. > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Noel Welsh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Increased memory bandwidth and more registers are the main benefits > > I'm aware of. I'm not sure if Racket exploits the later, but it should > > benefit from the former. > > > > N. > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:35 PM, John Clements <[email protected]> > wrote: > > ... > >> > >> In any case, I thought I'd just ask: how many of you are using 64-bit > builds, and how many are using 32-bit builds? Are there compelling advantages > to the 64-bit build that aren't occurring to me? > >> > >> John > > _________________________________________________ > > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > > > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
