So far with the small exposure I had to it, I liked it a lot. +1 to have it as an alternative to RackUnit :)
[]'s Rodolfo Carvalho On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:20, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote: > It started as soemthing small (yes, "hacky") that I intended to play > with and therefore never got any proper name or a place as a library. > Since then it grew to something I have a better idea for how it should > go. So the problem is not just a lack of documentation (scribbled or > comments), it's a bunch of changes that I need to do and then turn it > into a proper library. (Probably the most noticeable new feature that > will be added is teh ability to define new arrows.) > > > 30 minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > > > There is no scribbled documentation. -- Matthias > > > > > > On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > > > > > I don't think it's hacky at all. It's my favourite testing > > > system. I'm not sure why it isn't more publicly documented. (There > > > is documentation in the source file... however.) > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
